The OLPC initiative aims to fight poverty in developing nations by jumpstarting children's education. Providing computers to schools and children not only equips them for traditional curriculum, Negroponte says, but it empowers them in ways non-computer learning cannot -- connecting them with programming and computer science enables them to "think about thinking," as he puts it. He cites examples from both United States and overseas programs over the last 20 years where computers for schoolchildren have achieved amazing results, on a small scale that OLPC will dwarf.
Negroponte began by responding to recent criticisms of the project, including public comments by Bill Gates that the specifications of the laptops (which are still under development) are underpowered. Slim and trim does not mean the same thing as weak, Negroponte remarked, observing that the 500MHz processors planned for the devices were top-of-the-line just five years ago. Furthermore, he added, every increase in processing power seems to be met with an equal or greater increase in system requirements from Microsoft.
Red Hat is a partner in the program, providing an operating system at well below Microsoft's price, but Negroponte says that only 25% of the price for a typical new laptop goes to the OS vendor. A much larger chunk -- closer to 50% -- is consumed by sales and marketing overhead, distribution costs, and corporate profit.
OLPC, by contrast, has zero marketing overhead and very low distribution costs; it has single-order deals directly with the central governments of the seven nations included in the first phase of its rollout -- China, India, Thailand, Egypt, Nigeria, Brazil, and Argentina.
|
|
| Click to enlarge |
Despite its unique features, Negroponte insists that the enormous scale of the OLPC project allows the organization to purchase displays cheaply. He noted anecdotally that when he brought the requirements to one manufacturer, their people declined to bid, claiming that it did not match their "strategic plans" -- but they were willing to alter their strategic plan when the 100-million-unit order size entered the conversation.
Phase one of the rollout is scheduled for the first quarter of 2007, at which point OLPC expects the laptops to cost approximately $135 each. As hardware prices trend downward, however, the cost will drop -- Negroponte estimates that the laptops will cost $50 each by 2010.
Negroponte spent the last 20 minutes of his time taking questions from the audience. In response to one, he elaborated on the networking capabilities of the machines. Since the program will be implemented in conjunction with pubic schools, each school will receive a low-cost server and (where necessary) a satellite Internet backbone connection. Each laptop will be equipped with wireless mesh networking hardware to extend the range of the school's server, and the networking hardware will continue to run even when the laptops are switched off, so that they may act as routers for other participants.
Finally, Negroponte answered two questions from audience members interested in how to get involved in the project or something similar to it for their own community. Although the first phase of the project rollout will consist of OLPC dealing directly with national governments, he said, a second phase will allow individuals to subsidize laptops -- perhaps purchasing one for $300 that would then sponsor two or more in developing countries. As for getting involved in a laptop program for schoolchildren today, Negroponte's answer was simple: try eBay. "You can go buy a really good laptop for $300 or less today. You don't have to wait."
Note: Comments are owned by the poster. We are not responsible for their content.
alas, he also made one really dumb comment
Posted by: Anonymous Coward on April 05, 2006 09:50 PM"People aren't thinking about small, fast, thin systems," said Nicholas Negroponte, chairman of the One Laptop Per Child nonprofit association, in a speech at the LinuxWorld Conference and Expo here. "Suddenly it's like a very fat person (who) uses most of the energy to move the fat. And Linux is no exception. Linux has gotten fat, too." <a href="http://news.com.com/Negroponte+Slimmer+Linux+needed+for+100+laptop/2100-7346_3-6057456.html" title="com.com">http://news.com.com/Negroponte+Slimmer+Linux+need<nobr>e<wbr></nobr> d+for+100+laptop/2100-7346_3-6057456.html</a com.com>
That's an amazingly dumb statement. Here are the specs which is laptops are planned to have:
The system will use a 500MHz processor from Advanced Micro Devices with 128MB of memory. It will use 512MB of flash memory and no hard drive, he said. The biggest remaining cost is the display. The system will use a dual-mode display with a black-and-white, 1110-by-830-pixel mode in sunlight and a 640-by-480-pixel color mode otherwise.
So, light video on a 500/128 machine is not capable of handling GNU/Linux?!
What is he talking about?
I run Debian Sarge on a 300MHz/128MB (yes, that's *three hundered*) with KDE and OpenOffice 2.0 and its no lightening fast, but its very decent.
My guess is that he thinks of SuSE or Red Hat or Mandriva or some other RPMed distro, or that he has simply no idea how good a non-commercial distro like Debian can get.
He even can get lightening speed on his 500/128 machines. He needs to install Debian with no bells n whistles, recompline the kernel to get rid of all the useless "can do everything" stuff, make sure that no useless services are running use FluxBox as a desktop and use a slimmed down version of OpenOffice (or another office suite).
Heck - he can even offer to multi-boot Damn Small Linux (DSL) for hyper-drive speed.
But first, he needs to get his facts straight before making that kind of statements [not to mention that he confuses the kernel and the OS]
Good luck to him and his fantastic project!
#