This is a read-only archive. Find the latest Linux articles, documentation, and answers at the new Linux.com!

Linux.com

Feature: News

Microsoft influencing partner NGOs to support OOXML in India

By Mayank Sharma on March 04, 2008 (9:00:00 PM)

Share    Print    Comments   

Microsoft is encouraging its business partners to promote its Office Open XML specification (OOXML) to the Indian Bureau of Standards (BIS) and Ministry of IT. This move has incensed supporters of the rival OpenDocument Format (ODF) who fear that the "soft" Indian state may not be able to stand up to Microsoft pressure tactics.

Open Source Initiative (OSI) board member Raj Mathur claims to have a copy of the Microsoft letter to NGOs. "Microsoft has 'persuaded' several non-profit organizations," Mathur writes, "to bombard the Indian IT Secretary and the Additional Director General of the Bureau of Indian Standards with letters supporting its OOXML proposal."

Mathur describes the letters as "form letters" due to their template-like nature. "As per our discussion," the letter says, "please find attached the draft letters -- please cut/edit/ delete and change it any which way you find useful. Also attached is the list of NGOs who have sent the letters. And attached is also a document that details wht [sic] this debate is all about. Look forward to hear from you in this regard. In case you decide to send the letters, can you please send me a scan of the singed [sic] letters that you send out. Thanks this will help me track the process."

The letters themselves ask the NGOs to paraphrase "We support OXML [sic] as a standard that encourages multiplicity of choice and interoperability giving us the ultimate consumer the choice. [The NGO] recognizes that multiple standards are good for the economy and also for technical innovation and progress in the country, especially for smaller organizations like us, who require choice and innovation." After advising the NGO to write about their work, the Microsoft letters asks them to paraphrase "[The NGO] also supports OXML as this does not have any financial implications thus releasing our resources for welfare and development of society."

In a telephone interview, Venkatesh Hariharan, cofounder of the Open Source Foundation of India, says he doesn't blame the NGOs for sending the letters, "because they probably don't know what they are supporting." Mathur is of the same opinion and is interested in finding out "... how much they [the NGOs] really know about OOXML and open standards."

Microsoft works with several NGOs in India via its Project Jyoti program. None of the NGOs listed on the Project Jyoti Web site responded to email queries regarding the letters.

"India is a soft state," says Hariharan. "These kinds of unethical practices are going unchecked. [It's] very sad to see NGOs being misused for this kind of a process."

When contacted, Microsoft India's head for corporate communications, Meenu Handa, did not directly answer why the NGOs have been asked to endorse OOXML when they might not fully comprehend the issues involved. Handa instead gave us background on the Project Jyoti program and said that Microsoft has partnered with 13 NGOs with "cash and software grants amounting to only Rs37.5 crores (approx $9.3 million US)."

"The NGOs," Handa says, "represent an important section of society. It is for this reason that their views were sought to be represented on the committee formed by Bureau of India Standards (BIS) on the issue of [Office] Open XML. As an important stakeholder in this process, we have sought their opinion and support on the issue. Participating in the stewardship of what could become one of the world's most widely used document formats is an issue which the community is deeply interested in, as it is centered around customer choice and innovation. It is one point of view. There are others, I am sure.

"The process put in place by ISO to consider OOXML in the global library of standards is designed to enable national bodies from sovereign nations to participate in the review and improvement of standards deemed to be beneficial to the global IT industry and its users. [Office] Open XML is a strong example of that.

"I am sure you are also aware that the number of NGOs who have expressed their voluntary support on [Office] Open XML far exceeds the program partners we have for Project Jyoti. The decision to send a letter of support was made by each individual organization basis [sic] its own merit. Likewise, many of our partners also chose not to voice their opinion."

The NGOs aren't the only Microsoft partners to be receiving letters of support for the company. Last month, a respected Indian industry body, The Associated Chambers of Commerce and Industry of India (ASSOCHAM), issued a press statement "in public interest" recommending standardization of OOXML. According to Hariharan when questioned by a journalist, ASSOCHAM admitted to supporting Microsoft because the company is a member of the association.

Hariharan is peeved with ASSOCHAM because it did not consult any of the bodies campaigning for open standards in India. "I think FICCI had also got a request [from Microsoft]," says Hariharan, "and they circulated that among the members and they got opinion from IBM. And today how difficult is it to check up on an issue?"

This isn't the first time Microsoft has tried to influence its partners. Last year in Sweden the company offered extra "marketing contributions" to its business partners to encourage them to vote for OOXML. The trick worked, but the "yes" vote was later declared invalid. Following on the heels of the record antitrust fine, the European Union is now looking into Microsoft's activities in gaining approval for its OOXML format.

"India has not woken up politically," Hariharan says, "to the impact of [selecting the right standard]. So while we are discussing OOXML at a technical level, the issue is far deeper than that. Many people now say that holding of patents on standards is a non-tariff barrier to trade."

The Microsoft letters to the NGO are a wake-up call for groups rooting for open standards in India. "We'll talk to all the policy makers we know of," Hariharan says, "because these kind of proprietary standards are a tax on human communication and don't add any value to the local economy. And especially when there are multiple alternatives, we see no reason why India should compromise."

Share    Print    Comments   

Comments

on Microsoft influencing partner NGOs to support OOXML in India

Note: Comments are owned by the poster. We are not responsible for their content.

Another fine example of outsourcing to India!

Posted by: Anonymous [ip: 137.151.175.136] on March 04, 2008 11:14 PM
Not content with sending the jobs from the US to India, now they're sending the bribery/corruption as well. I wonder if the Indian government realizes that they could fine Microsoft a lot of money for such delightfully dubious tactics. Let us all wait with baited breath to see which other countries are going to have this happen...

#

Microsoft influencing partner NGOs to support OOXML in India

Posted by: Anonymous [ip: 116.68.69.147] on March 05, 2008 01:29 AM
Just how much of an influence this will have remains to be seen. Even though corruption and bribery are not something you can outsource to India(we have a large surplus in this area), the IT sector being so crucial to the economy ought to make the government think twice before trying to influence the BIS in this regard. The FOSS movement is also pretty well represented here, and the government would also want to avoid any negative publicity at this point of time, especially since many prominent academics in India have already voiced their dissatisfaction with the MS 'standard'. But then, never underestimate a politician's greed, stupidity, and lack of morals.
PS- note how Handa refers to it as OXML. MS may hire substandard programmers and their software may be second rate, but they do have the best PR and marketing spin doctors in the business and their double speak is second to none.

#

searching for stupid

Posted by: Anonymous [ip: 66.122.165.196] on March 05, 2008 01:38 AM
xml was designed to be open and wasn't it promoted by Mc soft via w3c. SOOOOO???

#

Microsoft influencing partner NGOs to support OOXML in India

Posted by: Anonymous [ip: 200.140.85.95] on March 05, 2008 02:53 AM
We could send letters to those NGOs! Anyone has addresses?

#

Microsoft influencing partner NGOs to support OOXML in India

Posted by: Anonymous [ip: 60.241.217.28] on March 05, 2008 08:39 AM
Disgusting tactics - if anything it proves why it should not be a standard - not even Microsoft thinks it can make it through based on it's design, so instead of doing the right thing (either supporting ODF or making a better, truly open format), they're resorting to corruption!

#

an act of desperation...

Posted by: Anonymous [ip: 221.128.147.184] on March 05, 2008 09:12 AM
MS is prying on ignorance. How long do you think that is going to work? People aren't fools you know. Some of them maybe ignorant now, but sooner or later they are going to wake up and realize their mistake. And then kick MS out the door for its unfair practises (just like the EU did). It's like stealing candy from a baby. The baby is going to grow up one day and then MS is going to find it difficult to sell anything to that baby. Even if MS succeeds now, it's nothing but a shallow victory.

Interoperability! Phoey! The OOXML format is encumbered with patents held by Microsoft. Meaning officially adopting OOXML in any FOSS project, or for that matter any project will be difficult without infringing something somewhere. Also effectively meaning, use MS office along with OOXML. That is exactly the reason they are pushing for format standardization. Standardization is a complex process that requires serious thought. The very definition of the term means party and vendor neutral standards, which the OOXML format fails to address.

In India people are divided into two camps, people who can afford MS products. They are the more knowledgeable ones (the IT cos and the tech savvy customers) and pretty much know what MS is up to.Two, the people who can't afford MS products, well, they don't have too much of a choice really. Besides the FOSS community in India is growing pretty rapidly since it's a lucrative alternative to the ridiculously high prices at which MS licenses it products, not to mention their high hardware requirements.

This looks more like an act of desperation than anything else.

#

Microsoft influencing partner NGOs to support OOXML in India

Posted by: Anonymous [ip: 202.80.58.210] on March 05, 2008 01:39 PM
What is the Open Source Foundation of India ?

#

Microsoft influencing partner NGOs to support OOXML in India

Posted by: Anonymous [ip: 122.163.171.199] on March 11, 2008 06:03 AM
i think Microsoft admitting to sending letters of support to various NGOs shouldn't be seen in negative light. every company and every technology wants to spread its message its message far and wide. what would be insulting for Indians would be if any company tried to wrongfully do it. IBM had sent letters to its partners to "influence" govt and other bodies to get a "NO" for OOXML from India. India has voted NO... so it is obvious that IBM's bride was a large sum compared to MS :).. read about this IBM letter here: http://www.askvg.com/should-india-be-held-hostage-to-unilateral-views-on-open-xml/
we should concentrate on making our community stronger and our technologies so desirable that people naturally get pulled towards our technology.. ODF or OOXML doesn't matter till it benefits the community!

#

Microsoft influencing partner NGOs to support OOXML in India

Posted by: Anonymous [ip: 130.215.224.144] on March 17, 2008 10:21 PM
Multiple document standards are helpful to consumers. In what world? For something like say, text, one open standard is your best bet as it encourages compatibility.

#

Microsoft influencing partner NGOs to support OOXML in India

Posted by: on March 22, 2008 06:29 PM
Overall a fair assessment of Fusion, but I really have a hard time agreeing with your comment about it being "...not cheap...". Sure it's not open source, but once you make the decision to purchase a piece of commercial software (I realise this is a bridge too far for some purists ;-) how you can call $80 for an absolutely stunning piece of engineering that gives you a near-perfect x86 virtual machines "...not cheap..." is way beyond me. Think back to what you had to do 5 years ago if you wanted to experiment with another operating system. For the record I'm a server side developer running Fusion with Win2K, OpenSolaris, and CentOS... it works well for me :-)

[Modified by: Joe Barr on March 22, 2008 07:36 PM]

#

This story has been archived. Comments can no longer be posted.



 
Tableless layout Validate XHTML 1.0 Strict Validate CSS Powered by Xaraya