This is a read-only archive. Find the latest Linux articles, documentation, and answers at the new Linux.com!

Linux.com

Feature: Reviews

Songbird audio player has potential, needs work

By Nathan Willis on September 28, 2007 (9:00:00 AM)

Share    Print    Comments   

Songbird is a cross-platform, Mozilla-based music player with high ambitions. The app is still undergoing heavy development, but it has come a long way since we looked at the 0.1 release in 2006. Songbird today can sing a pretty sweet tune, but to push its way into the big leagues, it needs to get over its own interface.

The latest release is 0.25, available for download for Linux, Windows, and Mac OS X. The project provides Linux builds for both 32-bit and 64-bit Intel architectures. Songbird uses GStreamer as its media back end on Linux, but VLC on Mac OS X and Windows, so make sure you have the proper dependencies preinstalled. In general, a Linux system that can run the latest Firefox can probably run Songbird as well.

If you are daring enough, you can also try a nightly build of Songbird, or grab the source code and compile it yourself. And you might find some new features in these more experimental versions of the application -- Songbird has yet to offer an "end user" release, and there are a lot of changes in the works prior to 0.3.

To get started quickly, just download the basic binary for your architecture. It comes as a gzipped archive that you can extract to any location in the filesystem and run. Change into the newly extracted Songbird directory and launch the app with ./Songbird &.

What you hear is what you get

Songbird and I got off on the wrong foot on first launch. The main window appeared and was immediately covered up by a file selection window asking me to choose a directory -- no explanation of what it was for. Luckily, canceling the window was no trouble and we were soon back on track.

You can have Songbird search your system for audio files and index everything it finds, or you can specify multiple individual folders for Songbird to watch. I designated my various music folders and was surprised at how quickly Songbird scanned and indexed their content -- much faster than Amarok or Rhythmbox on the exact same content.

Or at least that's how it seemed. The truth is, Songbird switched into the Library music browser pane well before it had finished its indexing. It seemed to load tracks in random order, and gave no feedback about whether it was finished. No progress bar indicated that indexing was still in progress, but every five minutes or so for the next two hours, a couple more artists would appear in the song browser. Only by comparing the totals in the Artist and Album columns to what I knew to be true could I tell when indexing was finished.

Playback quality itself was flawless; just what I would expect from a GStreamer-based player. Jumping to a random point in a track did not interrupt playback or cause an annoying screech. I tested MP3, Vorbis, AAC, FLAC, and WMA files, and all sounded great, loaded quickly, and had even ID3 tags, such as track number, recognized. I was disappointed that I could not get WAV files to play, but to be fair they are not advertised as supported. My understanding from the documentation is that Windows and OS X versions of Songbird can even play back encrypted iTunes Store purchases if iTunes is present on the computer, but I don't own any tracks with which to test that feature.

In spite of the playback quality, there are a lot of small hiccups that indicate the app is still unfinished. I noticed that Songbird failed to index the metadata from any of my FLAC files, although when I opened them manually via the File menu, they played fine and subsequently appeared in the Library. Once Songbird reached the end of a FLAC track that I had opened via File, it would play the next track in the folder -- but if you played the same track by double-clicking it in the Library browser, Songbird would not play the next track.

More alarming is that although the name of the current track is displayed in the faux-LCD "faceplate" at the top of the window, it is not highlighted in the browser. The dedicated jump-to-current-track button only seems to work when the current track is already onscreen, and the Copy to Device and Burn CD buttons do not appear to work at all.

Finally, when any track is playing, if you switch to another Artist or Album in the Library browser, playback stops with the end of the playing track -- regardless of the state of the Random and Repeat controls.

For people wondering whether Songbird is ready for duty as a daily music player, hangups like these make the answer no. Nevertheless, you can get a taste for some of Songbird's fancier features while you wait.

There's more music on the Web than on your hard drive

In addition to basic yet-another-jukebox functionality, Songbird has integrated Web browsing that it uses to serve up some intriguing music sources. At the simplest level, it can extract links to MP3 files and Shoutcast streams from pages. This allows Songbird to automatically queue up music from a wide variety of sites, including ones from static HTML, RSS-equipped blogs, search engines, and online stores.

The more complicated cases, like online stores, are usually designed to authorize and process payment through a traditional Web browser. Here Songbird works just like Firefox or any other Mozilla-derived browser -- the sole difference being that as soon as your purchase is made, Songbird downloads your tracks and they appear in your library instantly, ready to play. It is a few clicks quicker than using a separate browser and music player, but if you purchase a lot of music, the convenience will be worthwhile.

Any Web music files Songbird detects are automatically added to the Web Library list, where they are indexed but not downloaded. You can visit the Web Library just as you would a folder on your computer, download any of the listed files, or play them without downloading a copy to save locally. It's very convenient.

Current builds of Songbird come preloaded with sidebar links to more than 20 sites, ranging from commercial stores like Amazon.com to free resources like Creative Commons to independent music-oriented blogs. However, the groupings seem needlessly complex and arbitrary. The categories are Bookmarks, MP3 Blogs, Searches, Music Stores, Radio, Network Services, and Network Devices. All of the links are to Web pages; the content is treated identically. How does it help to put one independent music site (Ninjam) in the Network Services folder by itself, and another (Elbo.ws) in the Searches folder?

Installer and user interface gripes: party like it's 1998

One of the biggest problems with Songbird today is its interface. Earlier I mentioned that on first launch Songbird opened a file selection window without explaining what your selection would be used for. Was it just asking for a directory to scan for music files, or was it asking me to create a directory in which to house my music library? I have a large file library and, lacking explanation, I did not know whether Songbird was going to "manage" it for me by making a copy of every file it found. Duplicating your entire audio library may sound crazy to music lovers, but the same disk-draining maneuver is aggravatingly commonplace with photo management apps. A simple dialog box explaining the directory's purpose would have sufficed.

I canceled the file selection window and spent a few minutes browsing through the interface. Evidently the pushy window was there to prompt for a starting location from which to scan the system for music. Since I don't want my music player indexing interviews, podcasts, sound effects, and other miscellany, I skipped that option. Songbird did not give me the option of choosing the other built-in option, manually designating individual content directories.

Songbird can be extended through XUL add-ons, just as Firefox and Mozilla can. The installer starts out recommending a palette of extensions, but does not describe what any of them are for. Since installing extensions is a potential security risk, not telling the user what they are choosing is a Bad Thing.

Ever since Apple's iTunes hit it big, other audio players have mimicked its interface. But its popularity doesn't make it good. The left-most vertical column that Songbird dedicates to bookmarked Web sites and links to local and remote content is one such example. It is a narrow, non-scrollable vertical column, filled with horizontal text. Even moderately long list entries don't fit -- you have to abbreviate any links you add manually, and even some of the preselected bookmarks are too long.

With Mozilla technology at its disposal, Songbird should be using horizontal tabs to separate its content sources. Doing so would not only eliminate the skinny vertical column, but also eliminate the zig-zagging hierarchy of the main window's content panes. While the developers are at it, they could rearrange the app's buttons into a consistent layout. Some buttons toggle state (for example, Random mode), others perform an action (Burn CD, Jump to Current Track, or Back One Page in the Web browser), but they are scattered among four different locations on the window.

Another problem: the icons used on main playback buttons are wrong. The Fast Forward symbol skips to the next track; there is a different stock symbol for that button -- Songbird should use it. Same with the "back up to the beginning of the current track" button -- it uses the rewind symbol, which is also incorrect.

The built-in themes (or "feathers," as the Songbird menus describe them) cruelly sacrifice usability for style. They use fixed-size fonts and custom window manager decorations; both make the app inconsistent with the rest of the user's desktop. Because the fixed-size fonts are also quite small, they may be ann attempt to work around the fixed-width vertical column, and thus a case of two wrongs attempting to make a right.

There is simply no excuse for Songbird's eliminating the system's window manager frame and buttons to redraw its own smaller, uncustomizable, and Freedesktop noncompliant substitutes. There is a theme that attempts to re-enable the default window manager controls and buttons, but it is broken -- the menus are out of alignment and do not read the correct colors, leading to white-on-white text and other breakage.

Plus, the built-in themes are also extremely low contrast (one is dark gray on black, the other off-white on white), which is a separate problem. It makes me want to coin a new law of usability design -- "the cool-looking is the enemy of the good." Given that Songbird is themable via XUL, there may be hope that someone will write a proper theme, but in the meantime the app remains a tricked-out reminder of the developers' experience as coders on the project with the low point in the history of skinnable UIs, Winamp.

Finally, Songbird can't seem to make up its mind about its own logo. The app's now-playing faceplate, About dialog window, and Web site masthead all use one logo (a silhouetted, perched bird), but the rest of the Web site, marketing materials, and info use a juvenile and unprofessional flatulent cartoon character, and the application icon uses an egg.

Swan song

Songbird has set itself a lofty goal; the audio player market is highly saturated, and on both free and non-free desktops the big players are deeply entrenched. However, the free software community that enabled Mozilla Firefox to grow into the best Web browser in the world can do the same for music apps.

Songbird 0.25's technical underpinnings are excellent, and its integrated interface to the Web is insightful. This puts it on par with Miro, which is not merely a good video player but offers users a different enough experience that they have a compelling reason to switch. The potential to create that different experience is Songbird's real strength.

But when I look at the current version, the conscious choice to follow in the design decisions of iTunes and Winamp is holding it back in a big way. Those apps contain their share of mistakes, and creating a player that imitates them is a surefire way to inhibit Songbird's chances for success. Outside-the-box thinking led Firefox to innovations like tabbed browsing and bookmarklets -- I hope Songbird lets go of the past and opens up to unusual possibilities, too.

Share    Print    Comments   

Comments

on Songbird audio player has potential, needs work

Note: Comments are owned by the poster. We are not responsible for their content.

Songbird is an excellent media manager

Posted by: Lloyd on September 28, 2007 11:51 AM
Songbird is an excellent media manager.I personally like the interface its simple and way more functional than say iTunes. There are quite a few themes available for Songbird just wish there were more.
[Modified by: Lloyd on September 28, 2007 12:03 PM]

#

Songbird audio player has potential, needs work

Posted by: Anonymous [ip: 192.168.2.247] on September 28, 2007 01:38 PM
"has potential, needs work..." - which is oh so true of oh too many applications these days.

#

Songbird audio player has potential, needs work

Posted by: Anonymous [ip: 71.126.62.246] on September 28, 2007 08:39 PM
Hi,

I agree with your review of Songbird. I cut it a little more slack than you because it's at a .2 release, but I hear you. I have a problem with the last sentence in your article:

Outside-the-box thinking led Firefox to innovations like tabbed browsing and bookmarklets -- I hope Songbird lets go of the past and opens up to unusual possibilities, too."

You should be aware that the Opera web browser had tabbed browsing long before Firefox. It kills me no end that people attribute this feature to Mozilla innovation. Like when all those kids thought the song "Bohemian Rhapsody" ws released new with the movie "Wayne's World".

#

Re: Conspiracy to bury Opera in damnable lies

Posted by: schwim on September 29, 2007 03:57 PM
You can hardly blame anyone for mistakenly attributing the feature to Mozilla. Until not too long ago, you had to either pay for the browser or view crass and ridiculous advertisements to use the browser. The percentages the Big O was showing on traffic statistics were so small, they could be labeled miniscule. The exposure to the browser was slight, to say the least.

We could change it to say something like "Mozilla was the first to provide tabs in a browser you didn't have to pay for and without ads."

#

Re: Songbird audio player has potential, needs work

Posted by: Anonymous [ip: 32.104.18.243] on October 03, 2007 05:02 PM
Amen. Not only that but the text is also misleading because even within Mozilla products, Firefox is hardly the first one to use tabbed browsing. The old Mozilla SeaMonkey suite have been doing that for ages when Firefox - aka Phoenix back then - hit the streets. Most people have short memory span these days... :)

#

Songbird audio player has potential, needs work

Posted by: Anonymous [ip: 82.130.40.91] on September 29, 2007 10:05 AM
Just tried 0.25. Doesn't even play on my system. Couldn't find any settings page where to define audio output device. Probably failded because I have an ALSA-only system without OSS-emulation. The UI seems a bit kludgy, text looks bad in the dropdown menus. I'm sticking to MPD, which has the nice feature of removing the UI from the playback engine.

#

Songbird audio player has potential, needs work

Posted by: catfish57 on September 30, 2007 11:07 PM
i think song bird has great potential. but, it still does need some work,before the big boys and girls use.(major leage)i hope they keep working on it. it will be the best music media for linux.i am a beginner computer user,and songbird fascinates me.i think songbird will out do windows media player.

#

Uggh!

Posted by: Anonymous [ip: 86.135.91.120] on October 01, 2007 04:28 AM
I just looked at the URL you included. I'd forgotten how ugly that man is.

#

Songbird audio player has potential, needs work

Posted by: Anonymous [ip: 24.248.89.66] on October 02, 2007 04:58 PM
I surprised it isn't called Tunezilla

#

Songbird audio player has potential, needs work

Posted by: Anonymous [ip: 82.95.201.53] on October 03, 2007 12:10 AM
Please..... 0.2.5 is from FEBRUARY.... A lot has been done since that in the .3 nightlies... Many things youy describe have been worked on, mentioned improved. If you try take the time to compare these you'll find out yourself.

Ronald (not affiliated to songbird in any way, just a normal regular, satisfied, user)

#

Indeed try 0.3pre from september 28

Posted by: Anonymous [ip: 82.95.201.53] on October 03, 2007 12:44 AM
I should have changed my title in the parent post (yes mine to). My latest version was from 2 months ago and even since then a lot has been improved. I should have made a small summary

- ID tags recognition has improved alot

- UI has improved (and regarding the >>| vs >> stock icon issue, that is a matter of opinion if you just want to use 3 buttons instead of 6)


- Tabs have been added

And yes, there still can be improvements. Some rightfully so, some debatble, but Just try this newer version.

#

Songbird audio player has potential, needs work

Posted by: Anonymous [ip: 70.98.72.98] on October 03, 2007 12:58 AM
This is really a great app, I still use rhythmbox but I could see switching if it keeps improving like this.

I think your review was good but you really skipped over the coolness of the media enabled browsing stuff which is really the core of its innovation.

It uses basic standards to really improve the playback of music from the around the web...awesome work.

#

Songbird ate my system,

Posted by: Anonymous [ip: 149.254.192.192] on October 04, 2007 02:24 PM
I installed Songbird 0.2. The import messed around with my audio files and it completely trashed an iPod (not mine).

In comparison to Rhythmbox (or Banshee - only if you own an iPod) Songbird is a joke.

The web integration is nicely done but obviously rougher than a system where the software and server are designed to run together (like iTunes).

#

Songbird is my favorite linux media player

Posted by: Anonymous [ip: 67.91.239.99] on October 04, 2007 09:50 PM
Great media manager/player for linux. Deffinetly my favorite.

#

Songbird audio player has potential, needs work

Posted by: Anonymous [ip: 153.2.246.31] on October 05, 2007 04:33 PM
Man... that XULReader in SongBird is a resource hog the likes of which I have never seen before. Beware hooking up any ipod to SongBird with >1000 songs, you *WILL* be sorry. I mean, we're reading from a binary file for all intents & purposes, it doesn't take 100% of a core2 (both cores) to read the friggin' itunesDB!!

#

0.3 RC1 Relased

Posted by: Anonymous [ip: 66.92.185.54] on October 15, 2007 05:11 AM
<a href="http://www.songbirdnest.com/release-notes/0_3/RC1">http://www.songbirdnest.com/release-notes/0_3/RC1</a>

#

Songbird audio player has potential, needs work

Posted by: Anonymous [ip: 88.252.30.69] on December 12, 2007 02:06 PM
<a href="http://r10noktanet-seoyarismasi.blogspot.com" title="www.r10.net küresel ısınmaya hayır seo yarışması">www.r10.net küresel ısınmaya hayır seo yarışması</a>

#

Songbird audio player has potential, needs work

Posted by: Anonymous [ip: 88.230.192.187] on December 14, 2007 04:37 PM
<a href="http://www.2zler.com/?p=40" title="karikatür">karikatür</a>
<a href="http://www.2zler.com/karikatur/" title="karikatür">karikatür</a>
<a href="http://www.2zler.com" title="2zler, felek, video,komik videolar, komik video, fıkralar, komik fotoğraflar">komedi</a>
<a href="http://www.2zler.com" title="2zler, felek, video,komik videolar, komik video, fıkralar, komik fotoğraflar">karikatür</a>

#

This story has been archived. Comments can no longer be posted.



 
Tableless layout Validate XHTML 1.0 Strict Validate CSS Powered by Xaraya