This is a read-only archive. Find the latest Linux articles, documentation, and answers at the new Linux.com!

Linux.com

Feature

Microsoft PowerPoint versus OpenOffice.org Impress

By Bruce Byfield on December 07, 2004 (8:00:00 AM)

Share    Print    Comments   

By now, anyone who has researched replacing Microsoft Office with OpenOffice.org knows that Writer is an acceptable, even superior substitute for Word. But word processing is only part of what the average user needs in an office program. What if you need to design a slide show in OOo Impress? Coming from PowerPoint, what can you expect?

For starters, expect to feel nearly at home. Like the rest of OpenOffice.org, Impress is designed for an easy transition from Microsoft Office. Most of the same tools are available as in PowerPoint, and in the same places. This similarity means that, for most people, learning Impress is quicker than learning, for example, KPresenter. You may notice a slight change in name, and one or two features may be in different places, but you can count on locating basic functions without major problems. Now and then you may need to hunt for a feature, but if you assume that it's around somewhere, you'll be right more often than not.

Yet, despite the basic similarities, there are some inevitable differences in key areas such as:

  • Starting a slide show
  • Navigating the editing windows
  • Working with graphics, charts, and diagrams
  • Adding special effects
  • Preparing the slide show

In many areas, the differences are ones of detail rather than function. In others, a comparison of the two products might help you decide whether you came make a transition.

Starting a slide show

Impress and PowerPoint divide the honors equally when it comes to tools to get you up and running. Both allow you to structure slide shows from the heading styles of a text document, starting a new slide for every Heading 1 style. The command is Tools > Autosummarize in Microsoft Word, and File > Send > Autoabstract to Presentation in OpenOffice.org Writer, but the result is the same. Personally, after reading about the role that this type of tool played in the making of the satirical Gettysburg PowerPoint Address, I have grave doubts about them, but they're mostly harmless, so long as you exercise some judgment.

Both PowerPoint and Impress start with a tutorial for setting up a slide show. In PowerPoint, the tutorial is called a Wizard, while in Impress it's an AutoPilot. It's the same thing, but the implementation isn't. In PowerPoint, the Wizard helps you select a slide background, a structure for the slide show, the type of output, and nothing more. By contrast, the Impress AutoPilot not only guides you through these selections, but also the slide transition type and timing, and the title page. You can tweak these choices later if you choose, but what gives the AutoPilot the edge is that you don't have to. For rushed or first time users, it's that rarest of apps: An online tutorial that's actually useful.

However, as a former PowerPoint user, you'll be disappointed by the number of templates that come with Impress. In contrast to PowerPoint's several dozen templates, Impress offers only two. Neither is very useful, except perhaps as example of how not to.

People see the same templates over and over, so, from one perspective, the lack of templates is no great loss. Still, if you want a template library, you can quickly add one to Impress by downloading from the OOo Extras site. Once you've downloaded, follow these steps:

  1. Open any OpenOffice application, and select File > Templates > Organize. The Template Management window opens.
  2. Do one or both of the following:
    • If you want to make the template available as a design for slides, click the Presentations Background folder in the left pane.
    • If you want to make the template available as a structural guide for other slide shows, click the Presentations folder.
  3. From the Commands drop-down list, select Import Templates.
  4. Navigate to the downloaded templates. Then click on the Open button to import them into Impress.

The next time you start a slide show, the new templates will be available.

PowerPoint templates can be imported via the same steps. Either way, problem solved -- although OpenOffice.org could make the solution easier for you to find.

If you prefer to design your own slides, the judgment remains divided. Both applications use master slides -- views from which common elements of all slides are inserted, including backgrounds and logos -- but there is little to distinguish either implementation. Although PowerPoint's automatic insertion of footer information is quicker, Impress' range of options is wider, allowing for either header or footers as well as variable fields. Which you prefer depends on whether convenience or choice is more important to your work habits.

Verdict: Tie. Impress's lack of templates is a nuisance but correctable, and is counterbalanced by its AutoPilot.

Navigating the editing windows

When you open Impress for the first time, you'll notice immediate differences from PowerPoint in the editing window. In Impress, the default or Drawing View doesn't have a pane for Notes. That's in a separate view, available from View > Workspace. The same is true for the Outline View, although that's due to change in version 2.0 for OpenOffice.org, to judge from the developer builds. Another change due in version 2.0 is the removal of the tabs at the bottom of the page for managing slides. Meanwhile, the tabs are a handy way of maximizing the display space for your slides. Mostly, though, these differences are neither improvements nor deficiencies; they're simply variations.

The major difference from PowerPoint (unless you're using Microsoft Office 2003, which seems to have imitated the OpenOffice.org interface in several ways) is the number of floating windows. The first time you open Impress, you'll see the Presentation Tasks, a quick reference for common tasks; the Navigator, designed for jumping around the slide show and rearranging slides; and the Stylist, a quick tool for applying, editing, and managing styles. Each of these floating windows can be docked by pressing the Ctrl key as you drag it towards one side of the editing window. None add functionality that is missing from PowerPoint, but they make functions easier to access.

This increased ease of use is particularly important for the Stylist. PowerPoint does have styles, but they can be changed only from View > Master > Slide Master in PowerPoint. This positioning underemphasizes them so much that most users are not even aware of them. In contrast, the Stylist makes Impress's styles known and available. Your habits and work speed will benefit as a result.

Other than the floating windows, little in the Impress editing window should confound a PowerPoint user. Although in Impress, a slide can have a name that's different from its title -- a feature that's handy for the tabs -- in general the mechanics of editing slides is identical in PowerPoint and Impress. Adding, removing, redesigning, rearranging slides -- none differ in anything except minor variations on names. Non-graphical text, too, is added by clicking on a frame and starting to type. Since presentation software is much simpler than word processing or spreadsheet applications, the similarities mean you start to become productive in Impress almost immediately.

Verdict: Impress, for its floating windows and greater accessibility of advanced features.

Working with drawing objects, charts, and diagrams

If you start OpenOffice.org Draw, you'll notice that Impress shares most of its interface and functionality. This similarity is Impress's greatest strength. Unlike PowerPoint, it's not just a presentation program; it's a presentation program overlaid with a graphics program. That's why its default view is called the Drawing View.

This difference barely shows if all you do is add basic shapes. The drawing tool bars of Impress and PowerPoint differ in only minor details, If PowerPoint has a larger variety of predefined callouts, then Impress's Fontworks allows for a far greater range of effects with graphical text than PowerPoint's WordArt. The largest difference in the basic drawing tools is that, in PowerPoint, you have to drill down deep into the menu structure to find advanced features that are readily available in Impress. The same is true with charts. Aside from the fact that Impress's formatting options for chart elements are more accessible and perhaps slightly more extensive, for most users, there is little difference to choose between the two program's charting tools.

Where the difference really shows is in the advanced editing of graphics. Neither Impress nor Draw is a match for PhotoShop or the GIMP. Still, the difference is less than you might imagine. Both Draw and Impress include not only tools for precise positioning of objects, but also ones to adjust color resolution, and to select a color in either RGB or CMYK format. You can even apply one of half a dozen common filters to a graphic, or enter a group of objects to edit one of them without going through the tedious process of ungrouping then regrouping the objects when you are finished. You can also create a slide using layers, making complicated diagrams far easier to develop.

Yet perhaps the greatest advantage that Impress has over PowerPoint is the extension of the concept of styles to images. Each style contains a wide variety of options, including ones for fill, outline, and text. If an object to which a style is applied doesn't need a setting -- for example, if a square is tagged with a style in which a type of arrow is defined -- then it is simply ignored. Once a style is formatted, then applying it to a drawing object is much faster than copying and pasting an existing object then modifying it, which is what you have to do in PowerPoint. Just as importantly, if you edit a diagram, then changing the style immediately updates all objects tagged with it. For teachers or anyone else for whom diagrams are important, Impress's drawing capabilities are a major draw.

Verdict: Impress. PowerPoint is barely in the running in this category.

Adding special effects

Unhappily, the same cannot be said for Impress's abilities to include special effects. Impress and PowerPoint have similar transitions for slides, outline text, and objects, but, in almost every other way, the current version of Impress lags behind PowerPoint when it comes to special effects. Movies in Impress run in a sub-window, which is functional but less elegant than running them in the frame to which they are linked, as you do in PowerPoint. Similarly, although you can use Slide Show > Interactions to create navigational buttons, in PowerPoint they come ready made. The differences are small, but they soon add up to the impression of less sophistication.

The gap is widest with sound. Impress supports only .wav, .aif, and .au formats. Unlike PowerPoint, it supports neither MP3, the ubiquitous low-end format, or MIDI, the most common format for professional digitally generated sound. Nor does Impress support the playing of any format across an entire slide-show -- only on a slide by slide basis. Unlike PowerPoint, Impress has no tools for recording sounds or narration, nor for playing CD tracks.

The only type of special effect in which Impress has an edge is its ability to record animated .GIFs from objects created or inserted on a slide.

Happily, most of Impress's shortcomings seem to be addressed in version 2.0. Yet, for now, Impress's special effects almost make me believe the rumor that Sun Microsystems, the one-time owner of the OpenOffice.org code and still the main source of its developers, once banned slide shows from its meeting rooms. Sun purchased OpenOffice.org in 1999, and its ability to handle special effects is about what you would expect in a program several years older than that. Admittedly, third-party tools for converting sound formats are readily available, and clever editing can conceal the fact that sounds are limited to a single slide, but if sound is a major part of your slide shows, Impress will disappoint.

Verdict: PowerPoint. In sound especially, Impress is far outclassed.

Preparing a slide-show

In both programs, most of the tools for putting the final touches on a presentation are available from the Slide Show menu. In both cases, they include tools for rehearsing timings, producing a custom show by selecting which slides to use, and using the mouse cursor as a pointer. Impress lacks PowerPoint's projector wizard that helps establish the connection with a projector , but, given the simplicity of the connections, that hardly seems a problem.

In the same way, Impress might benefit from PowerPoint's Pack and Go (a.k.a. Package for CD) tool, which under either name is found in the File menu. Yet, since several font foundries have objected to this tool as a means for illegally redistributing proprietary fonts, maybe it is just as well not to have the tool -- although using free fonts would avoid any difficulty. Anyway, call me compulsive, but if I'm preparing for a slide show using strange equipment, I'm going to check and double-check everything for myself no matter what software I'm using. Moreover, because the tool is not completely reliable, you need to check it, too. So why bother?

Anyway, few users ever notice the feature. You don't miss what you never knew.

Verdict: Tie. Although some might give the point to PowerPoint, its advantages seem more apparent than real.

Conclusion

The ideal presentation program would include aspects of both PowerPoint and Impress. As things are, neither has an objective advantage, especially for beginning or intermediate users. Neither has a significant advantage in tools to help beginners or users in a hurry, nor in navigation. Nor are the useful tools for assembling a slide show significantly different.

For advanced users, the differences are more profound. On the one hand, if you're a teacher, an engineer, or anyone else for whom slide shows replace handout or overhead projectors, you'll find Impress's graphical capabilities a major advance over PowerPoint's.

On the other hand, users today are far more comfortable using sound than they were five years ago, and, if you're musically inclined, or want to include movies, then Impress will seem a step backward from PowerPoint. The convenience you find in PowerPoint now won't be in Impress until version 2.0. That release isn't due for another six months, but it already exists in a functional alpha build that corrects most of the problems.

With the new version, the differences between Impress and PowerPoint will be even smaller than they are now. For now, Impress matches PowerPoint in the basics, outclasses it in graphics, and is outclassed itself in special effects. Not a bad tally for an upstart program that hardly anyone had heard about five years ago.

Bruce Byfield is a computer journalist who writes regularly for Linux.com.

Share    Print    Comments   

Comments

on Microsoft PowerPoint versus OpenOffice.org Impress

Note: Comments are owned by the poster. We are not responsible for their content.

WTF are fonts for??

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on December 07, 2004 04:37 PM
Thank you for a detailed comparison. Yeah slide shows can be poo, but that's a problem of implementation; it's not necessarily the tool's fault.

This caught my eye and left me scratching my head:
"PowerPoint's Pack and Go (a.k.a. Package for CD) tool, which under either name is found in the File menu. Yet, since several font foundries have objected to this tool as a means for illegally redistributing proprietary fonts..."

OK, so you spent money for some fonts, and then what- no one else is allowed to look at them?? Crikey. The world is getting stranger all the time.

#

Re:WTF are fonts for??

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on December 08, 2004 01:40 AM

OK, so you spent money for some fonts, and then what- no one else is allowed to look at them?? Crikey. The world is getting stranger all the time.


I imagine that the reviewer meant that Pack and Go embeds the fonts in such a way that they can be extracted and reused by other people, rather than simply viewed. In this case, the recipients can use the fonts without paying proper royalties, instead of simply being able to view the fonts in a slideshow.

#

Flash export

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on December 07, 2004 05:23 PM
You forgot to mention the excellent export-to-flash tool in OO.o - great for adding presentations to webpage, and presumably could also be put on a CD without worries about Font usage<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)

mrBen
<A HREF="http://www.jedimoose.org/" title="jedimoose.org">www.jedimoose.org</a jedimoose.org>

#

Re:Flash export

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on December 07, 2004 10:11 PM
I think the "export to Flash" tool is good, but I wouldn't say that it's "excellent". It only creates a "static" flash file, with no animations, no movements, no nothing<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)

In my opinion, it needs a lot of work in order to be "excellent". But is only my opinion, of course...

#

Re:Flash export

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on December 10, 2004 07:32 PM
OK - let me rephrase: OO.o Impress exports to flash better than any other presentation software on the market at the moment, because, as far as I am aware, it is the only one that does it.

I can't say that I am a huge fan of flash, but that is mainly because it has been massively overused on websites. However, something like this, which allows a quick a simple way of taking an entire presentation and putting it into a single file that can easily be added to a webpage, is surely a useful addition, and thus worthy of a mention.

Just my $0.02

mrben

#

Flash sucks

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on December 08, 2004 12:57 AM
In my opinion, it is a great thing that he forgot to mention Flash. I wish everyone else would forget about it to.

StephenC.

#

Vectorisation feature

Posted by: ayeomans on December 07, 2004 05:57 PM
One feature I've found really useful in Impress/Draw is the "Convert to polygon" feature applied to an image. A great way to get high-quality scalable logos. Scan in an image, then use "Convert to polygon" to create a vector outline, then use "edit points" to tidy it up.

#

XML lets you do what you want to do

Posted by: JZA on December 07, 2004 11:41 PM
I found that XML lets you make your presentation a real knowledge base that can extend into the handnotes.
check
http://www.xml.com/lpt/a/2004/02/04/tr-xml.html

#

charts inadequate for scientific presentations

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on December 08, 2004 12:07 AM
I use OOo Impress for scientific presentations quite frequently. It's generally quite a nice tool, but there are three issues that repeatedly annoy me. I hope some or all of them will be fixed in 2.0:

1. Bullets, and particularly graphical bullets, are very hard to configure properly. Indenting, etc., can be a disaster.

2. The "appear" visual affect is not in the Frequent list of visual effects, so it takes an extra couple of seconds to tell OOo to make an object appear with no fancy animations. Overall, visual effects are a bit kludgey, and the lack of a more sophisticated sequencer for visual effects is frustrating.

3. Most important, the Chart component is utterly inadequate for scientific presentations, because the Standard Deviation feature on bar charts has been broken (i.e., wrong!) for literally years! Last I heard, Chart is not going to be fixed for 2.0. What a disaster.

#

Re:charts inadequate for scientific presentations

Posted by: Daniel Carrera on December 08, 2004 07:07 AM
Don't hope, help.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)
You should do two things:

1) Take a look at the feature guide:

http://marketing.openoffice.org/2.0/featureguide.<nobr>h<wbr></nobr> tml

2) Download the development build and see if it does what you want.

If it doesn't give a shout!
We are not very good at mind-reading<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)
Please come over and talk to us. We are making a lot of fantastic changes in OOo 2.0. Let's try to make sure that the ones you want are included.

Come over discuss@openoffice.org and talk to us.

Cheers,
Daniel Carrera.
OpenOffice.org volunteer.

#

Re:charts inadequate for scientific presentations

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on December 08, 2004 07:44 AM
It's reported as a bug, much discussion has been had about this bug, and the importance of this bug has been thrashed many times, but it's still marked "OOo later", i.e. "some time after 2.0 we we think about it". (Bug 3997)

But it's a showstopper.

It's almost as dumb a design decision as requiring all animation elements on a given slide to have the same method of advancing (all manual or all automatic) (Bug 33691).

For the sort of scientific work I do, OpenOffice is on a level with the 1993/4 Office products: Writer ~ WinWord 6 (except that Word 6 had better reference management through Endnote and had a better equation editor (Bug 35550) or field codes for equations (Bug 5919)), Calc ~ Excel 3 or 4, Impress ~ Powerpoint 95 (worse, actually, but that's my earliest experience with powerpoint).

The thing that OOo wins on is vector graphics... but then you can't export it in any format that can be imported into the MS Office products that you need to actually get the rest of your work done. (raster format export is limited to screen resolution, so even that's not a work around: see bugs 14394, 4499)

So while I'd love to use OOo for all my work, I can't... at least MSOffice works as well under WINE as it does under Windows!

*sigh*

#

Re:charts inadequate for scientific presentations

Posted by: Daniel Carrera on December 08, 2004 08:20 AM
I'm surprised that you use office suits for a lot of scientific work.

For *my* scientific work I use LyX, Maple, Gnuplot and Perl. Oh well. I hope that these bugs get fixed soon. I can't fix them myself, I'm not really a developer. I work on documentation.

Cheers,
Daniel Carrera.
OpenOffice.org volunteer.

#

Re:charts inadequate for scientific presentations

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on December 08, 2004 10:54 PM
Yeah, its true. Office packages produce hideous scientific documents when you compare the result to a latex/gnuplot combo. Truly a joy for the eyes.

#

Compatibility OO MS office

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on December 08, 2004 07:42 AM
As our company gives training courses in linux and of course it software, I was obliged to check out both OO and MSO. Now during this endeavour, I met with several things we are still missing in OO. One is the largest problems is importing net PowerPoint 2003 slides. These slides seem to be imported in a manner, you can make a presentation of 30 minutes pass in 20 seconds. Impress, doesn't really stop where it is supposed to be, or turns the animations into c.r.a.p. . Impress is not the biggest issue in the swap of office suite. calc also has it's own problems. Multiple formulas can give problems. Also, validation of cells seems to be a problem for your average john doe as then need to create their own macro's. To be honest I haven't checked creating macro's as that was not a part of the coursebook.
OpenOffice is a great substitute. But when swapping, you better keep both for a while. One to open slide shows, convert them to PowerPoint 97 and them import them into impress.
When you create files with OpenOffice you will not encounter any problems. Been a favorite users for over a year now (and played with staroffice 3 years ago)

#

MSO vs OO

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on December 08, 2004 08:30 PM
Facing enormous MS licensing costs following the acquisition of another company, my firm created a fairly large cross functional test group to pilot OO with.
The group had no problems with the other software in the suite but they rejected Impress in favour of PowerPoint.

While we could have addressed many of the issues with training in the end the company opted to pay the license fees and maintain the status quo.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(

 

#

Try comparing to Keynote on OS X

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on December 09, 2004 01:26 AM
Riiiight. Sure Impress is better than Powerpoint. But is it better tahn Keynote? No way.

Better luck next time<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)

#

latex-beamer is much better.

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on December 09, 2004 06:06 AM
I'm afraid you have to ask a techie though.

Just to make you drool: watch it by downloading, and then run
<TT>xpdf -fullscreen beamerexample1.pdf</TT>
Or with acroread and then hit Ctrl-L

If you open it in your browser you miss half the fun though.

<A HREF="http://latex-beamer.sourceforge.net/beamerexample1.pdf" title="sourceforge.net">http://latex-beamer.sourceforge.net/beamerexample<nobr>1<wbr></nobr> .pdf</a sourceforge.net>

#

Why not do something new with presentations

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on December 09, 2004 06:55 AM
I think it's sad that OOo mostly aims at cloning MS Office. Everybody complains about PP, so why not try something new, like Calientra?

#

Re: Why not do something new with presentations

Posted by: Anonymous [ip: 88.73.126.191] on August 21, 2007 10:00 AM
According to http://www.mind-mapping.org/ and search engine search results, Calientra does not exist anymore.

Its successor is "Xebece" (claim "Visualize and organize information easily") and can be found at:

http://xebece.sourceforge.net/

Hope this helps you?

#

Yeah...

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on December 18, 2004 03:47 AM
PowerPoint is better than Impress, just as Microsoft Word is better than OpenOffice. All Microsoft Office products have a grammar checker. OpenOffice doesn't. Therefore, I will use Office until OpenOffice comes up with a grammar checker of equal or greater quality than that of Word. Besides, everybody knows that Macs are of better quality than Windows machines anyways...

#

Re:Yeah...

Posted by: mulingsilang on December 23, 2004 09:28 AM
How efficient/reliable are those grammar checks anyways? Don't blame the tool for your incompetency. Microsoft creates the impression that you are so dumb that you cannot check your own grammar.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:) Open Office assumes that you are a competent English language user and wouldn't dare touch/improve your level.

#

Microsoft PowerPoint versus OpenOffice.org Impress

Posted by: Anonymous [ip: 86.139.157.109] on August 16, 2007 07:17 AM
There are a number of areas where Impress is better than PowerPoint.

1. Impress is free.
2. Export to Flash.
3. Eyedropper tool.
4. Visual indicator on the crop tool.
5. You can import PowerPoint files and you can save as PowerPoint.

We have a more detailed explanation at http://www.presentationhelper.co.uk/is-open-office-impress-better-than-powerpoint-94.htm

Presentation Helper

#

Microsoft PowerPoint versus OpenOffice.org Impress

Posted by: Anonymous [ip: 192.168.0.109] on September 10, 2007 07:23 AM
sex = 69

#

Microsoft PowerPoint versus OpenOffice.org Impress

Posted by: Anonymous [ip: 192.168.0.107] on September 10, 2007 07:29 AM
pajarillo

#

Microsoft PowerPoint versus OpenOffice.org Impress

Posted by: Anonymous [ip: 12.74.226.249] on October 15, 2007 06:17 AM
How about Version 1.0 of impress/presentation (or whatever it is called) vs Version 2.0 ? Version 1.0 is a useable product, slower than PowerPoint but useable enough for me to not install Powerpoint under wine.

I have version 1.0 of impress on an older version of Linux and have been using it to look at some old PPTs. I have version 2.0 on an up-to-date Mepis-Ubuntu installation. Apearantly I had never used impress/presentation V2.0 before. Thought I'd test it out after a minor security update. First offf, the non-responsive presentation wizard comes up and appears to have non-functional buttons--or maybe it runs one fifth the speed of the V1.0 version . This by itself is enough to disqualify impress/presentation V2.0. The "existing file" loaded--- finally.

The main program comes up the first time with way too many small windows, and cluttered top and bottom with too many icons and tool bars. This leaves a too small main window. Some of the Xs to close these extraneous windows do not work. F5-slideshow has show-stopper problem.
"Open office requires a java runtime environemnt...The selected JRE is defective." The slideshow window shows this message everytime I hit the space bar to the next slide. It is displaying the slide. What's the problem. Why are you defacing my slides with this stupid error message? (Besides my brokerage supplies solfware that is 100% java, and it has no problem with the JRE.) There is nothing wrong with my JRE.

AS I see it, the main thing I can do with impress/presentation is slideshow existing PPT's. V 2.0 fail this most fundamental task. I never used the drawing tool in PowerPoint, so I don't care how good those tools are in impress/presentation. All I want it to do is show me my slides. V 1.0 of Impress or PowerPoint will both do this. Also, V2.0 does not display one of my slides that displayed in V 1.0.-- a PowerPoint generated slide.

I tried reinstallation and even down grading to a slightly earlier vesion--- no change.

As I see it, I can either try to install an older version of impress/presentation. Though, I doubt that I can do that without reverting all the other OpenOffice applications too. (The new spreadsheet is better, I'd like too keep it.) Or, I can install PowerPoint under wine. Meanwhile I can continue using Impress V1.0 on my older Linux installation. V2 Impress is not useable for the most fundamental functions on my ner Linux installation.

#

Microsoft PowerPoint versus OpenOffice.org Impress

Posted by: Anonymous [ip: 96.230.241.15] on February 19, 2008 01:47 AM
"Working with drawing objects, charts, and diagrams" goes to impress? Draw a circle in impress and draw it in office 2007/2003. What will you see in impress a poor jerky aliased circle. This has been listed as a bug since 2004, and prevents me and every other person who does real presentations from every being able to use openoffice. fix that and maybe we can talk.

#

This story has been archived. Comments can no longer be posted.



 
Tableless layout Validate XHTML 1.0 Strict Validate CSS Powered by Xaraya