This is a read-only archive. Find the latest Linux articles, documentation, and answers at the new!

Re(1): By

Posted by: Anonymous [ip:] on July 29, 2008 01:00 PM
There's no need for name calling, it just shows your ignorance. It also how little you know about the differences between KDE 3.x and the KDE 4.x series. I still contend that KDE 4.1 is still a beta since it doesn't contain all the features of the previous release and there are regressions. Before going down the 3.x / 4.x argument, if KDE 4.x is suppose to be different from KDE 3.x, it should have been called by a different name.


Return to KDE 4.1 rocks the desktop