This is a read-only archive. Find the latest Linux articles, documentation, and answers at the new!

As the SCO rolls

Posted by: Anonymous [ip:] on May 06, 2008 12:20 AM
"The implication, which McBride vigorously denied, was that SCO had misled the stock-buying public in SEC documents in 2003 and 2004."

Actually, reading the transcript, my impression was exactly the opposite. The implication was that SCO (i.e. McBride) was attempting to mislead the judge (i.e. lying) in the immedite action.


Return to As the SCO rolls