Posted by: Anonymous
on January 17, 2008 06:27 PM
Maybe the author didn't notice that the CNR client is still in Beta? If this is taken into account, please mention it more visibly in the post.
I get the nagging feeling that this could have been a much better article. I keep looking for links to click on that take me to the real article somewhere else on the site. This is way too limited and short to be considered a full test of CNR.
This article, just like CNR, needs work. Maybe it's a beta article?