Posted by: Anonymous
[ip: 124.188.17.65]
on December 31, 2007 04:52 AM
Hmm,.. no reasoning offered or preferred alternative. Enjoy making comments with no value.
(side issue: a Captcha that relies on externally hosted JS to work (and fails telling you the captcha answer is wrong if external JS is blocked) is a bit lame isn't it? You're slugging your user for your spam problem by making them use the captcha -- cool -- but then you're also asking them to allow a script to run from a place they've probably never heard of (cetrk.com). Teaches bad habits.
Re: Amarok sucks!
Posted by: Anonymous [ip: 124.188.17.65] on December 31, 2007 04:52 AM(side issue: a Captcha that relies on externally hosted JS to work (and fails telling you the captcha answer is wrong if external JS is blocked) is a bit lame isn't it? You're slugging your user for your spam problem by making them use the captcha -- cool -- but then you're also asking them to allow a script to run from a place they've probably never heard of (cetrk.com). Teaches bad habits.
#