This is a read-only archive. Find the latest Linux articles, documentation, and answers at the new Linux.com!

Linux.com

Why not Git?

Posted by: Anonymous [ip: 75.72.96.53] on November 20, 2007 02:23 PM
Git already supports distributed version control with tags, like Mercurial. However, Git also supports lightweight branching in which an individual developer's repository can contain multiple branches. Mercurial seems to require separate repositories to achieve the same thing, which isn't as nice.

Mercurial is still a big step up from Subversion, but it seems Git is an even better choice.

#

Return to Introducing Mercurial, a distributed version control system