Posted by: Anonymous
[ip: 76.24.203.154]
on November 08, 2007 07:40 PM
Hi Joe-
I've seen better from you.
If one substituted 'CDF' for 'ODF' in what I have said in the past, my statements would be perfectly consistent. ODF is better and on some important ways still more open than the Kafka-esque OOXML. Also, some of my statements about ODF as a standard still hold; mainly now we are talking about its implementation, which is quite different & nuanced thing.
Potts will wish he'd held comment on CDF, where he's out-of-depth.
Learn about Linux
Download Linux
Get Linux help
What's up at the OpenDocument Foundation?
Posted by: Anonymous [ip: 76.24.203.154] on November 08, 2007 07:40 PMHi Joe-
I've seen better from you.
If one substituted 'CDF' for 'ODF' in what I have said in the past, my statements would be perfectly consistent. ODF is better and on some important ways still more open than the Kafka-esque OOXML. Also, some of my statements about ODF as a standard still hold; mainly now we are talking about its implementation, which is quite different & nuanced thing.
Potts will wish he'd held comment on CDF, where he's out-of-depth.
See you 'round & best wishes,
-Sam Hiser
#