Posted by: Anonymous
on October 05, 2007 01:00 PM
I call BS. This really does not look tob be built on OO.o. How could it be OO.o is licensed under the LGPL (and another similar Sun license). IBM would be violating that license if they would distribute it. I assume they have to make changes to the code, so unless you show me that it's linked to some unmodified part of OO.o I don't believe a word.