Posted by: Anonymous Coward
on May 24, 2007 02:08 AM
These pclinuxos reviews seem to be very superficial and a bit biased.(This guy has a point:http://www.kostaslinux.blogspot.com/)Sure pclos looks good and most of the stuff works out of the box but what modern distro doesnt do that ?Can anyone substantiate the claim that it has better hardware support than ubuntu ? all the distros i ve ever tried always achieved the same results for me.Is it really that polished ? what about the fact that it has 2 levels of submenus and some of them have only one entry ? is it really necessary ? the control center is very centralised but so what ? What does it really do that others dont ? Why pclos instead of sabyon for instance ?I dont get it people ! i d appreciate some real arguments instead of "it feels good"