Posted by: Anonymous Coward
on November 05, 2005 05:18 PM
There are two important details missing from this review:
1 - which viewers support viewing thumbnails located across multiple directories and subdirectories? Browsing on a per directory basis is frustrating for large collections.
2 - which viewers support EXIF/IPTC data? This allows you to more effectively manage your images, as well as tie important information to images (which can be critical if you are publishing images).
Adding tags, titles and descriptions to images is fine, but a waste of time if this meta data is written anywhere other than to IPTC.
Learn about Linux
Download Linux
Get Linux help
Two factors missing from this review
Posted by: Anonymous Coward on November 05, 2005 05:18 PM1 - which viewers support viewing thumbnails located across multiple directories and subdirectories? Browsing on a per directory basis is frustrating for large collections.
2 - which viewers support EXIF/IPTC data? This allows you to more effectively manage your images, as well as tie important information to images (which can be critical if you are publishing images).
Adding tags, titles and descriptions to images is fine, but a waste of time if this meta data is written anywhere other than to IPTC.
#