This is a read-only archive. Find the latest Linux articles, documentation, and answers at the new!

Perhaps but

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on August 05, 2005 04:27 PM
Those making the criticisms here are the ones who produce their own version of the VIA driver as open source.
Perhaps they're just annoyed that VIA is not including them in the process?
Perhaps they think that VIA is trying to produce a closed source driver by stealth (the VIA open source driver includes closed source binary libraries)?

I'm sure there are many other possible reasons but I believe your Microsoft FUD theory is wrong.


Return to VIA fouls up, seeks forgiveness on open source drivers