This is a read-only archive. Find the latest Linux articles, documentation, and answers at the new!


Posted by: Leon Brooks on June 23, 2005 05:35 PM
One thing not mentioned in Tables is splitting and merging cells. Writer can do at least as much of this as HTML can, and is much more capable than MS-Word when it comes to complicated tables.

For example, repeated splitting and mergings across generations get disconnected by MS-Word, but in Writer it's dead easy, very natural, to get them all synchronised again. I have a newsletter with just such a table in it which is about 25 generations old in the best load-last, save-as-new, edit tradition and routinely gets split and merged. No problems. If I'd been using MS-Word, I would have deleted the whole table in frustration and rebuilt it at least half a dozen times by now, and the document would be steadily growing. Kind of like a memory leak on disk.

BTW, Craig is an insightful critic. His views have been used to improve many software projects. Anyone in the OOo project, please note.


Return to Writer vs. Microsoft Word