Posted by: Anonymous Coward
on June 14, 2005 04:54 PM
Kernel-wise the NetBSD sources are way more portable . All platform code in one tree and compilable instead of X different sorts of fork-and-merge projects.
And I didn't consider Linus' words so diplomatic. If you read the answers he gives he is clearly saying Linux is better (which is, given he's the principal architect quite understandable).
Re:... Umm.... NetBSD?
Posted by: Anonymous Coward on June 14, 2005 04:54 PMAnd I didn't consider Linus' words so diplomatic. If you read the answers he gives he is clearly saying Linux is better (which is, given he's the principal architect quite understandable).
#