This is a read-only archive. Find the latest Linux articles, documentation, and answers at the new Linux.com!

Linux.com

Re:There are several points in this article

Posted by: tsg on June 14, 2005 04:04 AM
2.9 is followed by 2.10. Cope.



Whether or not it is a valid notation is not the point. It is confusing and that is the point. You're also ignoring that when the releases are sorted in an ftp directory they show up out of order. That is confusing and that is the point. It can be perfectly valid and still a bad notation.

#

Return to Decline and fall of the version number