Posted by: Anonymous Coward
on August 15, 2003 03:32 AM
In addition to this statement from Siemens, I wonder if there is any company that has ever evaluated the time lost in desktop use using Windows 98/2000 on PCs in an enterprise-wide level compared to Linux, in a typical day's work, and that which is lost with linux. To be fair, this comparison ought to be with controlled environment (well set-up systems, users are only Power Users and therefore unable to install applications themselves, etc..).
This would result in something like: Setup: Intel 500MHz/1GHz Desktop (or laptop) Cold Boot Up Login time starting Lotus Notes/Outlook (viewing emails/starting new messages in Notes is historically long!) opening word processor 1st time/next time opening spreadsheet first time/next time opening presentation tool first time/next time opening web browser first time/next time shutting down rebooting (yes, even in linux this may happen!) number of rebooting etc... (applications in Enterprise environment, not home use, hence no video viewer or filesharing software for example. IM is not yet a universally accepted tool in my experience either)
If workers in a 1000-employee company were asked to monitor all these tasks for a whole week, half of them on linux, half of them on Windows, this should return an average that's actually measurable and would start making sense.