Posted by: Anonymous Coward
on April 15, 2002 01:31 AM
Thats fine with me. Let them finish it, then, *before* they start distributing it. Once they move from coding to distributing the source code *must* follow the binaries. You are right, they didn't have to "beta publicly", and perhaps they shouldn't have. Thats not relevant. What is relavant is that they did "beta publicly" in an illegal manner, and they should a)release the beta source (NOW!) b)appoligize c)appoligize d)appoligize.
Re:The GPL doesn't work that way
Posted by: Anonymous Coward on April 15, 2002 01:31 AM#