This is a read-only archive. Find the latest Linux articles, documentation, and answers at the new Linux.com!

Linux.com

Re:BSDows? Re: FSF arrogance will stifle FS

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on April 14, 2002 01:28 AM
I agree, if BSD had been licensed under equivalent terms to the GPL then Linux would never have been needed.

I also agree with you that the most significant difference between Linux and BSD is the licensing terms. That's why it matters that they're enforced. If Lindows prefers BSD to Linux then they should use BSD. If they choose to use Linux then they must follow the lincensing terms. What's your problem?

#

Return to FSF asks Lindows, "Where's the source?"