Posted by: Anonymous Coward
on April 12, 2002 11:30 PM
By using GPL/LGPL source code they made an agreement to publish all the source code.
What possible reason can there be not to release _all_ of the source?
I'm not saying they've contributed nothing but they are in breach of copyright.
Free Software is the goal not commercial success. Getting companies involved can quicken the development. Sacrifice the companies you still have a Free system. Sacrifice the freedoms your given and your just left with a load of companies.
If a company wants to take part they should play by the rules.
Learn about Linux
Download Linux
Get Linux help
But why not _ALL_ the source?
Posted by: Anonymous Coward on April 12, 2002 11:30 PMto publish all the source code.
What possible reason can there be not to release
_all_ of the source?
I'm not saying they've contributed nothing but they
are in breach of copyright.
Free Software is the goal not commercial success.
Getting companies involved can quicken the
development. Sacrifice the companies you still
have a Free system. Sacrifice the freedoms your
given and your just left with a load of companies.
If a company wants to take part they should play
by the rules.
#